There
is also a technical problem. Say you are a homeowner in Cyprus and you
sold your house for US$1M the day before they announced the confiscatory
measures. The buyer paid you $1M and you deposited it in the bank. Now,
you will now lose 40–60% of your money, but you haven't done anything
wrong. You just sold your house. Or what if I own no land, but have
stored all of my wealth in bank deposits? The technical and political
details involved in making bail outs fair—spreading out the pain—are
very difficult. It may not be feasible to sanction depositors. - in The Gold report
Marc Faber News Blog Investments and Trading Ideas - A Tracking Blog About Dr. Gloom Boom & Doom Marc Faber , Daily Tracking of Dr. Marc Faber Investment Strategy , Market analysis , Outlook & Media appearances
Saturday, June 8, 2013
In Europe : The main Question is who pays for what?
Marc Faber :
European policymakers believe that in the next round of bank bailouts
the depositors will have to pay their part, as was the case in Cyprus.
The main question is who pays for what? In Cyprus, accounts up to
€100,000 ($129,000) are adjudged to be safe, but accounts above that
limit may lose as much as 40–60%. There is a question of social equity
here: why should a depositor with €5M in a Cyprus bank lose, while a
depositor with less than €100,000 sits pat?